Article Text
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. Children in low-income countries are disproportionately affected. This is in large part due to limitations in healthcare resources and medical technologies. Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving therapy for many children with acute respiratory failure. The scarcity of functioning ventilators in low-income countries results in countless preventable deaths. Some hospitals have attempted to adapt to this scarcity by using hand-bag ventilation, as either a bridge to a mechanical ventilator, or until clinical improvement occurs rendering mechanical ventilation no longer necessary. In instances of hand-bag ventilation, an endotracheal tube is first placed. Family members are then asked to play the role of a ventilator, manually compressing a bag repeatedly to inflate the child’s lungs. This approach is fraught with numerous ethical challenges. A careful examination of the data and a nuanced approach to the ethical considerations are imperative. Ethical arguments in support of and in opposition to allowing parental hand-bag ventilation are explored, including the best interests of the child, the child’s right to an open future, beneficence and parental protection, legitimising substandard care, and finally, contextual concerns. An algorithmic, potentially ethically permissible approach to parental participation in manual ventilation is proposed.
- ethics
- resource allocation
- autonomy
- paediatrics
- decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors wrote and edited the manuscript in its entirety.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Manual ventilation and open suction procedures contribute to negative pressures in a mechanical lung model
- PRactice of VENTilation in Middle-Income Countries (PRoVENT-iMIC): rationale and protocol for a prospective international multicentre observational study in intensive care units in Asia
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Respiratory management of the infant with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy
- The value of non-invasive ventilation
- Design, development and evaluation of Artificial Breathing Capability Device (ABCD): a novel innovation for respiratory support
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach
- Weaning from mechanical ventilation in people with neuromuscular disease: a systematic review
- Multicentre observational study on practice of ventilation in brain injured patients: the VENTIBRAIN study protocol