Article Text
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. Children in low-income countries are disproportionately affected. This is in large part due to limitations in healthcare resources and medical technologies. Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving therapy for many children with acute respiratory failure. The scarcity of functioning ventilators in low-income countries results in countless preventable deaths. Some hospitals have attempted to adapt to this scarcity by using hand-bag ventilation, as either a bridge to a mechanical ventilator, or until clinical improvement occurs rendering mechanical ventilation no longer necessary. In instances of hand-bag ventilation, an endotracheal tube is first placed. Family members are then asked to play the role of a ventilator, manually compressing a bag repeatedly to inflate the child’s lungs. This approach is fraught with numerous ethical challenges. A careful examination of the data and a nuanced approach to the ethical considerations are imperative. Ethical arguments in support of and in opposition to allowing parental hand-bag ventilation are explored, including the best interests of the child, the child’s right to an open future, beneficence and parental protection, legitimising substandard care, and finally, contextual concerns. An algorithmic, potentially ethically permissible approach to parental participation in manual ventilation is proposed.
- ethics
- resource allocation
- autonomy
- paediatrics
- decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors wrote and edited the manuscript in its entirety.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision - making
- Design, development and evaluation of Artificial Breathing Capability Device (ABCD): a novel innovation for respiratory support
- The harm threshold and parents ’ obligation to benefit their children
- Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley
- Emergency management of children with acute severe asthma requiring transfer to intensive care
- Harm is n't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- WESTERN REGIONAL MEETING ABSTRACTS
- Establishment of a prospective cohort of mechanically ventilated patients in five intensive care units in Lima, Peru: protocol and organisational characteristics of participating centres
- Bubble continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of severe paediatric pneumonia in Malawi: a cost - effectiveness analysis
- Western Regional Meeting Abstracts