Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Author note This paper owes much to an earlier paper that I wrote jointly with my colleague Kirsty Keywood which was published as 'Information, Ignorance and Autonomy' in the journal Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. Publisher: Kluwer, 2001. The present paper concentrates solely on the ethical issues whereas our joint paper considered the legal dimensions of this issue in some detail. However, the present paper covers some of the same moral ground as that covered in 'Information, Ignorance and Autonomy'. Kirsty’s influence is still very much a feature of this paper and I acknowledge a substantial debt to her.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics briefings
- Doctor could face financial ruin even if he wins libel case
- ‘ The right not to know and the obligation to know ’, response to commentaries
- The chilling effect of English libel law
- Secret remedies: 100 years on
- ‘ Patient trade ’ in Germany: an ethical issue at the practitioner – clinician interface in 1909 and 2009
- We should reform libel laws in light of Singh victory
- Medical authority and nursing integrity
- Medicine needs its MI5
- Ethics briefings