Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Author note This paper owes much to an earlier paper that I wrote jointly with my colleague Kirsty Keywood which was published as 'Information, Ignorance and Autonomy' in the journal Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. Publisher: Kluwer, 2001. The present paper concentrates solely on the ethical issues whereas our joint paper considered the legal dimensions of this issue in some detail. However, the present paper covers some of the same moral ground as that covered in 'Information, Ignorance and Autonomy'. Kirsty’s influence is still very much a feature of this paper and I acknowledge a substantial debt to her.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human rights and ethical considerations for a tobacco-free generation
- Why the human rights act matters to doctors
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- Promoting the freedom of thought of mental health service users: Nussbaum’s capabilities approach meets values-based practice
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Human rights and bioethics
- Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
- Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values
- Dismembering the ethical physician
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice