Article Text
PDFCommentary
Methodological challenges in deliberative empirical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @stacymcarter
Contributors SMC is the sole author of this work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain
- Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues
- Response to commentaries on ‘Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK’
- Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics
- Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- The role of ‘public opinion’ in the UK animal research debate
- Empirical Bioethics and the Health ‘Brain-Drain’: a qualitative study of the experiential and ethical landscape of compulsory community service for a group of South African doctors
- Deliberative ethics in a biomedical institution: an example of integration between science and ethics