Article info
PDFCommentary
From preferences to policies? Considerations when incorporating empirical ethics findings into research policymaking
- Correspondence to Professor Emily A Largent, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; elargent{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Citation
From preferences to policies? Considerations when incorporating empirical ethics findings into research policymaking
Publication history
- Received March 27, 2020
- Accepted April 10, 2020
- First published May 26, 2020.
Online issue publication
May 29, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 May 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?
- Oxford brain health clinic: protocol and research database
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Confidentiality and the duties of care
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities
- Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
- Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients’ data with for-profit companies for research
- Research using free text data in medical records could benefit from dynamic consent and other tools for responsible governance