Can there be wrongful life at the end of life? German courts revisit an old problem in a new context
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley? Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: ethical, legal and practical dilemmas
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs  EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Why the BMA guidance on CANH is dangerous
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- Ethics of providing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration: current issues