Responses
Other content recommended for you
- Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley? Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: ethical, legal and practical dilemmas
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Why the BMA guidance on CANH is dangerous
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- Ethics of providing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration: current issues