Article info
PDFResponse
Some notes on the nature and limits of posthumous rights: a response to Persad
- Correspondence to Dr Sean Aas, Kennedy Institute of Ethics & Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA; sean.aas{at}gmail.com
Citation
Some notes on the nature and limits of posthumous rights: a response to Persad
Publication history
- Received September 9, 2019
- Revised October 7, 2019
- Accepted October 9, 2019
- First published October 18, 2019.
Online issue publication
May 04, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 May 2020).
- Previous version (14 May 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one’s body
- Gestaticide: killing the subject of the artificial womb
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- To know the value of everything—a critical commentary on B Björkman and S O Hansson’s “Bodily rights and property rights”
- Four problems for the pregnancy rescue case
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures