Article info
PDFCommentary
‘The right not to know and the obligation to know’, response to commentaries
- Correspondence to Dr Ben Davies, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; benjamin.davies{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
‘The right not to know and the obligation to know’, response to commentaries
Publication history
- Received April 2, 2020
- Accepted April 2, 2020
- First published April 29, 2020.
Online issue publication
May 14, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 April 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Are physicians obligated always to act in the patient's best interests?
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- A qualified endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, based on two widely shared beliefs about the brain-diseased patients such research might benefit
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- The right not to know and the obligation to know
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith’?