Article info
PDFCommentary
Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith’?
- Correspondence to Aisha Deslandes, Houston, TX, USA; aishadeslandes{at}gmail.com
Citation
Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith’?
Publication history
- Received February 25, 2020
- Accepted March 3, 2020
- First published April 29, 2020.
Online issue publication
May 04, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (4 May 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- ‘The right not to know and the obligation to know’, response to commentaries
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- Opacity, difference and not knowing: what can psychiatry learn from the work of Édouard Glissant?
- Would you like to know what is wrong with you? On telling the truth to patients with dementia
- Transformational healing: the phenomenology of fulfilment in the face of adversity
- Ethical reflections on the thoughts and lives of Kurosawa's doctors
- Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey
- Ethics of Incongruity: moral tension generators in clinical medicine
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?