Article Text
PDFCommentary
Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith’?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @Aisha_Deslandes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A systematic review on the effect of the organisation of hospital discharge on patient health outcomes
- Impact of gastroenterologist care on health outcomes of hospitalised ulcerative colitis patients
- Engagement without entanglement: a framework for non-sexual patient – physician boundaries
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- ‘ The right not to know and the obligation to know ’, response to commentaries
- Impaired imitation of gestures in mild dementia: comparison of dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer 's disease and vascular dementia
- Effects of evidence - based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review
- Western Regional Meeting Abstracts
- Good medical ethics, from the inside out—and back again
- Measuring patients ' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk