Article info
PDFCommentary
Commentary on ‘The right not to know and the obligation not to know’
- Correspondence to Benjamin Berkman, Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; berkmanbe{at}mail.nih.gov
Citation
Commentary on ‘The right not to know and the obligation not to know’
Publication history
- Received March 5, 2020
- Accepted March 12, 2020
- First published April 29, 2020.
Online issue publication
May 04, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (4 May 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- The views of cancer patients on patient rights in the context of information and autonomy
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective
- The case of Ms B: suicide’s slippery slope?
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B
- Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis