Article info
Response
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Correspondence to Dr Karl Ekendahl, Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 26, Sweden; karl.ekendahl{at}filosofi.uu.se
Citation
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
Publication history
- Received August 14, 2019
- Accepted August 21, 2019
- First published October 19, 2019.
Online issue publication
April 09, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- A defence of the potential future of value theory
- Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument