Article info
PDFOriginal research
Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?
- Correspondence to Dr Hervé Maisonneuve, IRAFPA Institute for Research and Action on Fraud and Plagiarism in Academia, Geneva, Switzerland; herve{at}h2mw.eu
Citation
Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?
Publication history
- Received July 30, 2019
- Revised October 22, 2019
- Accepted October 24, 2019
- First published November 8, 2019.
Online issue publication
April 09, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 November 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training
- Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
- Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
- Research funding and authorship: does grant winning count towards authorship credit
- Honorary and ghost authorship
- Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for short - term researchers
- Authorship policies of scientific journals
- Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings
- Thinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers ' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine
- Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey