Article Text
Response
Wrongdoing and responsibility in the context of cumulative harms: a response to commentators
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Stop the bleeding: we must combat explicit as well as implicit biases affecting women surgeons
- Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact
- Women in trauma surgery: advancing our profession through international collaboration
- Impact of gender bias on women surgeons: a South African perspective
- Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study
- Prevalence and characteristics of anti-Indigenous bias among Albertan physicians: a cross-sectional survey and framework analysis
- Association between patient-surgeon gender concordance and mortality after surgery in the United States: retrospective observational study
- Dissecting disparity: improvements towards gender parity in leadership and on the podium within the Canadian Orthopaedic Association
- Gender distribution and leadership trends in trauma surgery societies
- ‘Too male, too pale, too stale’: a qualitative exploration of student experiences of gender bias within medical education