Article info
PDFCommentary
Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary
- Correspondence to Dr Samantha Brennan, University of Guelph College of Arts, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada; samantha.brennan{at}uoguelph.ca
Citation
Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary
Publication history
- Received February 19, 2020
- Accepted February 19, 2020
- First published March 30, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 09, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 April 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact
- Stop the bleeding: we must combat explicit as well as implicit biases affecting women surgeons
- Impact of gender bias on women surgeons: a South African perspective
- Systems thinking in gender and medicine
- Commentary on ‘Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons, and their cumulative impact’ by Hutchison
- Women in trauma surgery: advancing our profession through international collaboration
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- ‘Too male, too pale, too stale’: a qualitative exploration of student experiences of gender bias within medical education
- Gender equality in the global health workplace: learning from a Somaliland–UK paired institutional partnership