Article Text
PDFCommentary
Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵See “The Moral Status of Micro-Inequities: In Favour of Institutional Solutions,” Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 2: Moral Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Ethics, Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul, Oxford 2016.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons and their cumulative impact
- Stop the bleeding: we must combat explicit as well as implicit biases affecting women surgeons
- Impact of gender bias on women surgeons: a South African perspective
- Systems thinking in gender and medicine
- Commentary on ‘Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons, and their cumulative impact’ by Hutchison
- Women in trauma surgery: advancing our profession through international collaboration
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- ‘Too male, too pale, too stale’: a qualitative exploration of student experiences of gender bias within medical education
- Gender equality in the global health workplace: learning from a Somaliland–UK paired institutional partnership