Article Text
Abstract
In their paper Horton et al argue that it is acceptable to contact an anonymous egg-donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor conceived child, despite the donor, ‘indicating on a historical consent form that she did not wish to take part in future research, and that she did not wish to be informed if she was found to be a carrier of a “harmful inherited condition”’. There are a number of claims embedded in Horton et al’s position that it is acceptable to contact the donor and request that she at least think about participating in genetic testing. In this response. I will go through their main claims and argue that the area of genomic medicine does not justify exceptions to general consent conditions as the authors suppose and conclude that the donor should not be contacted. I will then go on to suggest a policy change that would address Horton et al’s concerns but would not involve over-riding any previously expressed wishes.
- genetic information
- genetic screening/testing
- informed consent
- reproductive medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors LF is the sole author.
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘ the right to know ’
- Ethics briefings
- New life for the HFEA
- Assisted conception and the law in the United Kingdom
- ‘ I have n’t met them, I do n’t have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown ’: a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research
- Britain ’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Direct - to - consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation
- Ethics briefings
- Sex selection and regulated hatred