Article info
PDFOriginal research
Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Correspondence to Prabhpal Singh, Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Montclair, New Jersey, USA; p248singh{at}uwaterloo.ca
Citation
Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
Publication history
- Received May 21, 2019
- Revised July 19, 2019
- Accepted August 21, 2019
- First published September 5, 2019.
Online issue publication
February 21, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (5 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Parental responsibilities and moral status
- Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Orphans and the relational significance of birth: a response to Singh
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson’s violinist thought experiment