Article Text
Abstract
In recent years, online direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical companies have been created as an alternative method for individuals to get prescription medications. While these companies have noble aims to provide easier, more cost-effective access to medication, the fact that these companies both issue prescriptions (via entirely online medical reviews that can have no direct contact between physician and patient) as well as distribute and ship medications creates multiple ethical concerns. This paper aims to explore two in particular. First, this model creates conflicts of interest for the physicians hired by these companies to write prescriptions. Second, the lack of direct contact from physicians may be harmful to prospective patients. After analysing these issues, this paper argues that there ought to be further consideration for regulation and oversight for these companies.
- quality of health care
- health care economics
- interests of health personnel/institutions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors HC planned the paper and wrote all but the section titled 'Necessity of In-Person Medical Evaluations'. All research and writing for that section was contributed by JM.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Influence and management of conflicts of interest in randomised clinical trials: qualitative interview study
- Financial conflicts of interest among US physician authors of 2020 clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study
- Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
- Ethics and Technology Transfer
- Commercial influence and the content of medical journals
- Conflict of interest in online point-of-care clinical support websites
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- ‘You feel like you’ve been duped’: is the current system for health professionals declaring potential conflicts of interest in the UK fit for purpose? A mixed methods study
- Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review
- Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors