Article Text
Original research
Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
Abstract
The contemporary philosophical literature on abortion primarily revolves around three seemingly intractable debates, concerning the (1) moral status of the fetus, (2) scope of women’s rights and (3) moral relevance of the killing/letting die distinction. The possibility of ectogenesis—technology that would allow a fetus to develop outside of a gestational mother’s womb—presents a unique opportunity for moral compromise. Here, I argue those opposed to abortion have a prima facie moral obligation to pursue ectogenesis technology and provide ectogenesis for disconnected fetuses as part of a moral compromise.
- abortion
- ectogenesis
- personhood
- moral compromise
- Killing/Letting die distinction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The inconsistency argument: why apparent pro-life inconsistency undermines opposition to induced abortion
- The Two tragedies argument
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Regulating abortion after ectogestation
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood