Article info
PDFCommentary
Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems
- Correspondence to Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208-3479, USA; campoel{at}amc.edu
Citation
Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems
Publication history
- Received January 1, 2020
- Accepted January 11, 2020
- First published January 23, 2020.
Online issue publication
February 07, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 January 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
- ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries
- Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Science fiction in bioethics: a role for feminist narratology
- Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise