Article Text
Ethics briefing
Ethics briefing
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵R (on the application of Philippe George Newby) v The Secretary of State for Justice [2019] EWHC 3118 (Admin). [40]
↵R (on the application of Philippe George Newby) v The Secretary of State for Justice [2019] EWHC 3118 (Admin).
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics briefing
- Ethics briefings
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Increase in assisted suicide in Switzerland: did the socioeconomic predictors change? Results from the Swiss National Cohort
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician
- Changes in BMA policy on assisted dying
- Ethics briefings