Article info
PDFResponse
‘Serious’ science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
- Correspondence to Satvir Kalsi, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; skalsi{at}mcw.edu
Citation
‘Serious’ science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
Publication history
- Received August 11, 2019
- Accepted October 1, 2019
- First published October 17, 2019.
Online issue publication
February 07, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 October 2019).
- Previous version (24 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification
- ‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response
- Ethics of modifying the mitochondrial genome
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Genetics insight into the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia spectrum
- Similar early clinical presentations in familial and non-familial frontotemporal dementia
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
- Genetic architecture of sporadic frontotemporal dementia and overlap with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases