Citation Tools
PDFResponse
‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- ‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response
Other content recommended for you
- The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification
- Birth defects surveillance after assisted reproductive technology in Beijing: a whole of population-based cohort study
- Preimplantation genetic testing for a chr14q32 microdeletion in a family with Kagami-Ogata syndrome and Temple syndrome
- Is the ‘serious’ factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Scientists, bioethics and democracy: the Italian case and its meanings
- Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human
- Risk of prostate cancer for men fathering through assisted reproduction: nationwide population based register study
- ‘Serious’ science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
- Long-read sequencing and haplotype linkage analysis enabled preimplantation genetic testing for patients carrying pathogenic inversions