Citation Tools
PDFResponse
Is the ‘serious’ factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Is the ‘serious’ factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers
Other content recommended for you
- The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Birth defects surveillance after assisted reproductive technology in Beijing: a whole of population-based cohort study
- Preimplantation genetic testing for a chr14q32 microdeletion in a family with Kagami-Ogata syndrome and Temple syndrome
- Health professionals and human rights campaigners: different cultures, shared goals
- ‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response
- Long-read sequencing and haplotype linkage analysis enabled preimplantation genetic testing for patients carrying pathogenic inversions
- Fertility treatment for people with epilepsy