Article info
PDFExtended essay
Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics
- Correspondence to Dr Camillia Kong,Birkbeck University of London Institute for Criminal Policy Research, London, UK; camillia.kong{at}bbk.ac.uk
Citation
Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics
Publication history
- Received February 4, 2019
- Revised July 30, 2019
- Accepted August 1, 2019
- First published September 28, 2019.
Online issue publication
February 07, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Ethical dangers of facial phenotyping through photography in psychiatric genomics studies
- The Ottawa Statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomised trials: précis for researchers and research ethics committees
- Identity, law, policy and Communicating Mental Health
- Ethics, human rights and HIV vaccine trials in low-income settings
- Pay More Attention: a national mixed methods study to identify the barriers and facilitators to ensuring equal access to high-quality hospital care and services for children and young people with and without learning disabilities and their families
- Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability study: summary of findings and the protocol for the 10-year follow-up study
- Experiences of psychotropic medication use and decision-making for adults with intellectual disability: a multistakeholder qualitative study in the UK
- What to tell and how to tell: a qualitative study of information sharing in research for adults with intellectual disability
- Presence of minor and major mental health impairment in adolescence and death from suicide and unintentional injuries/accidents in men: a national longitudinal cohort study