Article info
PDFOriginal research
What does ‘quality’ add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement
- Correspondence to Professor Alan Cribb, Centre for Public Policy Research, London SE1 9NH, UK; alan.cribb{at}kcl.ac.uk
Citation
What does ‘quality’ add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement
Publication history
- Received June 16, 2019
- Revised September 10, 2019
- Accepted September 16, 2019
- First published November 15, 2019.
Online issue publication
February 07, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 November 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Aesthetics for everyday quality: one way to enrich healthcare improvement debates
- Physicians’ clinical experience and its association with healthcare quality: a systematised review
- The NHS and market forces in healthcare: the need for organisational ethics
- Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature
- When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge
- Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
- Ethical considerations in quality improvement: key questions and a practical guide
- A cluster-randomised quality improvement study to improve two inpatient stroke quality indicators
- Identifying and resolving the frustrations of reviewing the improvement literature: The experiences of two improvement researchers
- Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign