Article info
Commentary
On measuring attitudes about payment for research
- Correspondence to Dr Luke Gelinas, Advarra Inc, Columbia, Maryland, USA; Luke.Gelinas{at}advarra.com
Citation
On measuring attitudes about payment for research
Publication history
- Received October 13, 2020
- Accepted October 19, 2020
- First published November 24, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 27, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 November 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- Fair go: pay research participants properly or not at all
- Compensating for research risk: permissible but not obligatory
- Commentary on 'Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model'
- Payment in challenge studies from an economics perspective
- Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?
- Controlled human infection with Neisseria lactamica in late pregnancy to measure horizontal transmission and microbiome changes in mother–neonate pairs: a single-arm interventional pilot study protocol
- Protocol for the challenge non-typhoidal Salmonella (CHANTS) study: a first-in-human, in-patient, double-blind, randomised, safety and dose-escalation controlled human infection model in the UK
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai