Article info

Download PDFPDF
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues

Authors

  1. Correspondence to Dr Dagmar Schmitz, Department of History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany; daschmitz{at}ukaachen.de
View Full Text

Citation

Schmitz D
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues

Publication history

  • Received October 8, 2019
  • Accepted October 24, 2019
  • First published November 12, 2019.
Online issue publication 
October 28, 2020

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you