Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19
- Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
- How to overcome lockdown: selective isolation versus contact tracing
- Justifiable discrimination? on Cameron et al’s proportionality test
- Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron
- Mental health condition of college students compared to non-students during COVID-19 lockdown: the CONFINS study
- Pandemic justice: fairness, social inequality and COVID-19 healthcare priority-setting
- Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
- How patients with COVID-19 managed the disease at home during the first wave in Spain: a cross-sectional study
- Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines