Article info
Response
Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly
- Correspondence to Dr Jonathan A Hughes, School of Law, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; j.a.hughes{at}keele.ac.uk
Citation
Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly
Publication history
- Received August 6, 2020
- Accepted August 12, 2020
- First published August 26, 2020.
Online issue publication
October 28, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage
Other content recommended for you
- Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19
- Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
- How to overcome lockdown: selective isolation versus contact tracing
- Justifiable discrimination? on Cameron et al’s proportionality test
- Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron
- Mental health condition of college students compared to non-students during COVID-19 lockdown: the CONFINS study
- Pandemic justice: fairness, social inequality and COVID-19 healthcare priority-setting
- Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
- How patients with COVID-19 managed the disease at home during the first wave in Spain: a cross-sectional study
- Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines