Article info
Current controversy
Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
- Correspondence to Professor Julian Savulescu, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; julian.savulescu{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
Publication history
- Received April 22, 2020
- Revised May 29, 2020
- Accepted May 31, 2020
- First published June 19, 2020.
Online issue publication
October 28, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 June 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic
- How to overcome lockdown: selective isolation versus contact tracing
- Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate
- Epidemiology of COVID-19 and effect of public health interventions, Chennai, India, March–October 2020: an analysis of COVID-19 surveillance system
- Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron
- Lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 in nine sub-Saharan African countries
- Burden and factors associated with perceived stress amidst COVID-19: a population web-based study in Pakistan
- Bridging a false dichotomy in the COVID-19 response: a public health approach to the ‘lockdown’ debate