Article Text
Commentary
Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Population-based survey methods to quantify associations between human rights violations and health outcomes among internally displaced persons in eastern Burma
- An analysis of tax abuse, debt, and climate change risk in low-income and lower-middle-income countries
- Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China
- New BMA book highlights human rights abuses
- Ethics briefings
- Engaging with China on organ transplantation