Article info
PDFCommentary
Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
- Correspondence to Mr Cory E Goldstein, Rotman Institute of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; cgoldst2{at}uwo.ca
Citation
Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
Publication history
- Received July 20, 2020
- Accepted July 21, 2020
- First published August 19, 2020.
Online issue publication
September 23, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 September 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- The human rights responsibilities of multinational tobacco companies
- Health impact of human rights testimony: harming the most vulnerable?
- Population-based survey methods to quantify associations between human rights violations and health outcomes among internally displaced persons in eastern Burma
- Engaging with China on organ transplantation
- Ethics briefing
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Tobacco industry’s human rights makeover: an archival review of British American Tobacco’s human rights rhetorical veneer