Article Text
Commentary
Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @coryegoldstein, @_APeterson_
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- The human rights responsibilities of multinational tobacco companies
- Health impact of human rights testimony: harming the most vulnerable?
- Population-based survey methods to quantify associations between human rights violations and health outcomes among internally displaced persons in eastern Burma
- Engaging with China on organ transplantation
- Ethics briefing
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Tobacco industry’s human rights makeover: an archival review of British American Tobacco’s human rights rhetorical veneer