Article info
PDFCommentary
The ethics of the unmentionable
- Correspondence to Dr Arthur L Caplan, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU, New York, New York, USA; Arthur.Caplan{at}nyumc.org
Citation
The ethics of the unmentionable
Publication history
- Received August 15, 2020
- Accepted August 20, 2020
- First published September 7, 2020.
Online issue publication
September 23, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 September 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Engaging with China on organ transplantation
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Chinese rules on transplantation do not go far enough
- Doctor testifies to China's reuse of prisoners' organs
- Creating human organs in chimaera pigs: an ethical source of immunocompatible organs?
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- A matter of life or death: China moves towards changing its transplantation practices