Article info
PDFFeature article
Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Correspondence to Professor Wendy A Rogers, Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia; wendy.rogers{at}mq.edu.au
Citation
Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
Publication history
- Received December 19, 2019
- Revised February 7, 2020
- Accepted March 5, 2020
- First published July 1, 2020.
Online issue publication
September 23, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 September 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- Applying safeguards of research integrity to unethical organ donation and transplantation
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- Coping with scientific misconduct
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data