Article info
PDFResponse
Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes
- Correspondence to Dr Charles Weijer, Rotman Institute of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; cweijer{at}uwo.ca
Citation
Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes
Publication history
- Received November 2, 2019
- Accepted November 13, 2019
- First published November 26, 2019.
Online issue publication
January 14, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 January 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
- Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the Ottawa Statement through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trial
- Randomised evaluation of government health programmes does present a challenge to standard research ethics frameworks
- Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers
- The Ottawa Statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomised trials: précis for researchers and research ethics committees
- Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers
- Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration
- Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
- Republished: How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types
- How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types