Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Decisions regarding life-sustaining medical treatments for young children with profound disabilities can be extremely challenging for families and clinicians. In this study, Brick and colleagues1 surveyed adult residents of the UK about their attitudes regarding withdrawal of treatment using a series of vignettes of infants with varying levels of intellectual and physical disability, based on real and hypothetical cases.1 This is an interesting study on an important topic. We first highlight the limitations of using these survey data to inform public policy and then offer a different interpretation from the authors’ regarding their findings about the value the public appears to place on relational capacity.
The authors asked members of the lay public to interpret a disabled child’s best interest in a series of vignettes. The respondents were 92% white; 59% were atheist or reported no religious affiliation. Though the authors note this lack of diversity as a limitation, we would add that this limitation is particularly problematic in this context. Minority views on this issue may differ significantly from the majority perspective. When the stakes are high (as is the case for questions about withdrawing life-sustaining therapy from infants over parental objections), use of public opinion data to directly inform policy requires, at a minimum, a representative sample reflecting both the true diversity of views within the public and a method to justly account for the alternate views of the minority.
Even if the sampled population were more …
Footnotes
Contributors AW participated in conceptualisation of the project and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BSW provided input into conceptualisation and on several drafts of the manuscript. DD provided feedback on several drafts of the manuscript. EP provided feedback on several drafts of the manuscript. SS participated in conceptualisation of the project overall and substantial edits to several drafts of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Deciding when a life is not worth living: Animperative to measure what matters
- Don't stop now? How long should resuscitation continue at birth in the absence of a detectable heartbeat?
- Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
- Implementing children's rights and health
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance