Article info
PDFCommentary
Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
- Correspondence to Dr Russell Powell, Philosophy, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; powell{at}bu.edu
Citation
Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
Publication history
- Received August 2, 2019
- Accepted August 2, 2019
- First published August 13, 2019.
Online issue publication
September 09, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 September 2019).
- Previous version (9 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Abortion and regret
- Resourcefulness of an empirically informed and thickly normative account of disease
- Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe
- Designing AI for mental health diagnosis: challenges from sub-Saharan African value-laden judgements on mental health disorders
- Ecological study of the association between mental illness with human development, income inequalities and unemployment across OECD countries
- An argument for intolerance
- Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak