Article Text
PDFCommentary
Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JW and JC: conceptualised and wrote the commentary.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘ Rethinking “ Disease ”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment ’
- Response to commentaries on Powell / Scarffe feature article
- Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘ Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment ’ by Powell and Scarffe
- A Kantian argument against comparatively advantageous genetic modification
- The definition of mental disorder: evolving but dysfunctional
- Are physicians obligated always to act in the patient 's best interests
- A little toleration, please
- An argument for intolerance
- We should eliminate the concept of disease from mental health
- Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past