Article Text
PDFCommentary
Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JW and JC: conceptualised and wrote the commentary.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
- Treatments of homosexuality in Britain since the 1950s—an oral history: the experience of professionals
- Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?
- The significance of ‘severity’
- Associations between parental socioeconomic position and health-seeking behaviour for diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection among under-5 children in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study