Article info
PDFCommentary
Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe
- Correspondence to Dr Havi Carel, Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK; Havi.Carel{at}bristol.ac.uk
Citation
Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe
Publication history
- Received June 28, 2019
- Accepted July 1, 2019
- First published July 16, 2019.
Online issue publication
September 09, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 September 2019).
- Previous version (9 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
- Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Chronic fatigue syndrome
- Abortion and regret
- Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
- Debating disability
- Development of the chronic fatigue syndrome in severely fatigued employees: predictors of outcome in the Maastricht cohort study
- Neurodiversity and disability: what is at stake?