Article info
PDFCommentary
Commentary on ‘Moral reasons to edit the human genome’: this is not the moral imperative we are looking for
- Correspondence to Dr Sarah Chan, Centre for Biomedicine Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh M13 9PL, UK; sarah.chan{at}ed.ac.uk
Citation
Commentary on ‘Moral reasons to edit the human genome’: this is not the moral imperative we are looking for
Publication history
- Received July 16, 2019
- Accepted July 17, 2019
- First published August 27, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 27, 2019
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- What is genethics?
- “Eugenics talk” and the language of bioethics
- Everything in moderation, even hype: learning from vaccine controversies to strike a balance with CRISPR
- In vitro eugenics
- Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique
- Paternal age bioethics
- Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
- Whereto speculative bioethics? Technological visions and future simulations in a science fictional culture
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva