Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
  1. Rachel Horton,
  2. Anneke M Lucassen
  1. Department of Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anneke M Lucassen, Department of Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton so165ya, UK; a.m.lucassen{at}soton.ac.uk

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors wrote and revised this commentary.

  • Funding AML’s work is supported by funding from a Wellcome Trust collaborative award 208053/Z/17/Z.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This article has been amended since it was first published online. This article has been changed from a Response to a Commentary article.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors wrote and revised this commentary.

  • Funding AML’s work is supported by funding from a Wellcome Trust collaborative award 208053/Z/17/Z.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This article has been amended since it was first published online. This article has been changed from a Response to a Commentary article.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles