Article metrics
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
- Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
- We need to talk about imperatives
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR
- The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
- Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
- Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction
- Calibration of polygenic risk scores is required prior to clinical implementation: results of three common cancers in UKB
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Does urbanicity modify the relationship between a polygenic risk score for depression and mental health symptoms? Cross-sectional evidence from the observational HUNT Study in Norway