What are considered ‘good facts’? | Journal of Medical Ethics

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

JME Commentaries
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Article info

XML

Response

What are considered ‘good facts’?

Authors

Akira Akabayashi Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Eisuke Nakazawa Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Nancy S Jecker Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa PubMed articles Google scholar articles

Correspondence to Professor Akira Akabayashi, Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; akirasan-tky{at}umin.ac.jp

Citation

Akabayashi A, Nakazawa E, Jecker NS

What are considered ‘good facts’?

Journal of Medical Ethics 2019;45:473-475.

Publication history

Received January 10, 2019
Revised January 22, 2019
Accepted January 25, 2019
First published February 18, 2019.

Online issue publication

August 02, 2019

Article Versions

Previous version (18 February 2019).
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.