Article info
PDFResponse
Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Correspondence to Joona Räsänen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Box 1020 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway; joona.rasanen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
Publication history
- Received April 30, 2019
- Accepted May 22, 2019
- First published June 29, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- On legal age change
- Moral case for legal age change
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- Epigenetic clocks in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review
- Construction of the secondary care administrative records frailty (SCARF) index and validation on older women with operable invasive breast cancer in England and Wales: a cohort study
- A novel somatic mutation achieves partial rescue in a child with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome
- Is ageing undesirable? An ethical analysis