Article info
PDFResponse
Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
- Correspondence to Toni C Saad, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK; tonisaad1{at}hotmail.com
Citation
Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
Publication history
- Received March 25, 2019
- Accepted April 23, 2019
- First published May 15, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral case for legal age change
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- On legal age change
- Is ageing undesirable? An ethical analysis
- Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Age-dependent prognostic value of exercise capacity and derivation of fitness-associated biologic age
- On Ageing and Maturing
- Construction of the secondary care administrative records frailty (SCARF) index and validation on older women with operable invasive breast cancer in England and Wales: a cohort study