Article info
PDFCommentary
Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
- Correspondence to Dr Per Sandin, VPE, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7043 SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden; per.sandin{at}slu.se
Citation
Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
Publication history
- Received May 31, 2019
- Accepted May 31, 2019
- First published June 13, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- How should we treat human–pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status?
- The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
- Implications of moral uncertainty: implausible or just unpalatable?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Animus: human-embodied animals